4.7 Article

Lewis base complexes of AlH3: prediction of preferred structure and stoichiometry

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 42, Issue 19, Pages 6965-6978

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3dt00047h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structures adopted by a range of complexes AlH3 center dot nL, (n = 1 or 2), have been explored in detail to identify the factors that determine the value of n, and whether a monomeric or dimeric arrangement is preferred for the 1 : 1 complexes. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction, vibrational and NMR spectroscopies, and thermal analysis data have been collected, DFT calculations have been performed for AlH3 center dot nL species, and pK(a) values have been collated for a series of amine and phosphine ligands L. The pK(a) of the ligand L exerts an important influence on the type of complex formed: as the basicity of L increases, a monomeric structure is favoured over a dimeric arrangement. Dimeric amine complexes form if pK(a) < 9.76, while monomeric complexes are preferred when pK(a) > 9.99. The steric requirements of L also influence the structural preference: bulky ligands with large cone angles (>163 degrees) tend to favour formation of monomers, while smaller cone angles (<125 degrees) encourage the formation of dimeric or 1 : 2 adducts. The steric bulk of the ligand appears to be more important for phosphine complexes, with smaller phosphines being unable to stabilise the complex at ambient temperatures even through dimerisation. Raman spectroscopy and DFT calculations have been particularly helpful in elucidating the stoichiometric preferences of complexes that have been contentious; these include AlH3 center dot NMe2Et, AlH3 center dot NMe3 and AlH3 center dot nEt(2)O.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available