4.7 Article

Visible light-harvesting cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes as triplet photosensitizers for triplet-triplet annihilation based upconversion

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 41, Issue 35, Pages 10680-10689

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2dt30955f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC [20972024, 21073028, 21103015]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT10ZD212, DUT11LK19]
  3. Ministry of Education [NCET-08-0077]
  4. Royal Society (UK)
  5. NSFC (China-UK Cost-Share Science Networks), State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals [21011130154, KF0802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visible light-harvesting cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes with 3-(2-benzothiazoly)-7-diethylaminocoumarin as the C boolean AND N cyclometalation ligands were prepared. The ancillary N boolean AND N ligand is either 6-piperidine naphthalimide-phenanthroline (Ir-1) or 9-aminophenanthroline (Ir-3). Ir(ppy)(2)(Phen) was prepared as model complex (Ir-2). Ir-1 and Ir-3 show strong absorption of visible light (epsilon = 109 000 M-1 cm(-1) or 112 000 M-1 cm(-1) at 486 or 484 nm, respectively). All the complexes show room temperature phosphorescence with drastically different phosphorescence quantum yields (Phi(P) = 4.3%, 44.3% and 46.0% for Ir-1, Ir-2 and Ir-3, respectively). With steady state and time-resolved spectra, as well as DFT calculations, the T-1 excited states of Ir-1 and Ir-3 were proposed to be the (IL)-I-3 state, whereas the (MLCT)-M-3 state was proposed for Ir-2. Long-lived emissive triplet excited states (7.6 mu s and 54.5 mu s) were observed for Ir-1 and Ir-3, compared to the short T-1 excited state lifetime of Ir-2 (1.2 mu s). The complexes were used as triplet photosensitizers for triplet-triplet annihilation upconversion and upconversion quantum yields (Phi(UC)) of 19.3% and 12.7% were observed for Ir-1 and Ir-3, respectively. No upconversion was observed for Ir-2 under the same experimental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available