4.7 Article

MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 587-593

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.163550

Keywords

PET/MRI; attenuation correction; level-set segmentation; brain PET

Funding

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy [10030030]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2014M3C7034000]
  3. Korea Health Industry Development Institute [HI13C01630200]
  4. Intramural Research Grant of Seoul National University [0420130670, 2013-1290]
  5. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [10030030] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inaccuracy in MR image-based attenuation correction (MR-AC) leads to errors in quantification and the misinterpretation of lesions in brain PET/MRI studies. To resolve this problem, we proposed an improved ultrashort echo time MR-AC method that was based on a multiphase level-set algorithm with main magnetic field (B-0) inhomogeneity correction. We also assessed the feasibility of this level-set-based MR-AC method (MR-AC(level)), compared with CT-AC and MR-AC provided by the manufacturer of the PET/MRI scanner (MR-AC(mMR)). Methods: Ten healthy volunteers and 20 Parkinson disease patients underwent F-18-FDG and F-18-fluorinated-N-3-fluoropropyl-2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane (F-18-FP-CIT) PET scans, respectively, using both PET/MRI and PET/CT scanners. The level-set-based segmentation algorithm automatically delimited air, bone, and soft tissue from the ultrashort echo time MR images. For the comparison, MR-AC maps were coregistered to reference CT. PET sinogram data obtained from PET/CT studies were then reconstructed using the CT-AC, MR-AC(mMR), and MR-AC(level) maps. The accuracies of SUV, SUVr (SUV and its ratio to the cerebellum), and specific-to-nonspecific binding ratios obtained using MR-AC(level) and MR-AC(mMR) were compared with CT-AC using region-of-interest-and voxel-based analyses. Results: There was remarkable improvement in the segmentation of air cavities and bones and the quantitative accuracy of PET measurement using the level set. Although the striatal and cerebellar activities in F-18-FP-CIT PET and frontal activity in F-18-FDG PET were significantly underestimated by the MR-AC(mMR), the MR-AC(level) provided PET images almost equivalent to the CT-AC images. PET quantification error was reduced by a factor of 3 using MR-AC(level) (SUV error < 10% in MR-AC(level) and < 30% in MR-AC(mMR) [version VB18P], and < 5% in MR-AC(level) and < 15% in MR-AC(mMR) [VB20P]). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that our new multiphase level-set-based MR-AC method improves the quantitative accuracy of brain PET in PET/MRI studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available