3.9 Article

Innovation in the Italian ice cream production: effect of different phospholipid emulsifiers

Journal

DAIRY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages 33-49

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13594-013-0146-1

Keywords

Italian gelato; Emulsifiers; Physical properties; Volatile compounds; Storage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artisanal Italian ice cream (called gelato) is one of the most appreciated Italian food specialties. Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids represent the most used emulsifiers for gelato but the demand for clean label products containing lower amount or no additives or stabilizers is continuously increasing among consumers. In this work, the impact of three phospholipid emulsifiers (soy, milk and rice phospholipids) was evaluated on physicochemical, thermal and flavour characteristics of a basic Italian gelato formulation in comparison to those of mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids, used as control. Control sample showed the highest overrun and unfreezable water values but also the lowest fat destabilization percentages. On the contrary, gelato added with soy phospholipids exhibited the greatest resistance to melt and high fat destabilization ratio being also harder than the others. Sample with rice phospholipids revealed a richer volatile profile with herbal and green notes. The lowest performances were displayed from gelato where milk phospholipids were added as emulsifier as this sample showed higher mix viscosity, green colour notes, lower overrun, hardness and stickiness values. During a 4-week storage in a domestic freezer, all samples hardened and became more yellow, showing a decrease of volatiles except for samples with rice phospholipids added. These findings may encourage further research on the use of soy and rice phospholipids as emulsifiers to improve their performances in gelato making, by testing their use alone or in combination at different levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available