4.7 Article

Characterization of commercially cold sprayed copper coatings and determination of the effects of impacting copper powder velocities

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 466, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.001

Keywords

Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction (EBSD); Recrystallization; Cold spray; Electrodeposition; Tensile testing

Funding

  1. Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO)
  2. Nagra
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering research Council (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper coated steel containers are being developed for the disposal of high level nuclear waste using processes such as cold spray and electrodeposition. Electron Back-Scatter Diffraction has been used to determine the microstructural properties and the quality of the steel-copper coating interface. The influence of the nature of the cold-spray carrier gas as well as its temperature and pressure (velocity) on the coating's plastic strain and recrystallization behaviour have been investigated, and one commercially-produced electrodeposited coating characterized. The quality of the coatings was assessed using the coincident site lattice model to analyse the properties of the grain boundaries. For cold spray coatings the grain size and number of coincident site lattice grain boundaries increased, and plastic strain decreased, with carrier gas velocity. In all cases annealing improved the quality of the coatings by increasing texture and coincidence site-lattices, but also increased the number of physical voids, especially when a low temperature cold spray carrier gas was used. Comparatively, the average grain size and number of coincident site-lattices was considerably larger for the strongly textured electrodeposited coating. Tensile testing showed the electrodeposited coating was much more strongly adherent to the steel substrate. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available