4.1 Article

Genetic Evidence for Concerted Control of Actin Dynamics in Cytokinesis, Endocytic Traffic, and Cell Motility by Coronin and Aip1

Journal

CYTOSKELETON
Volume 67, Issue 7, Pages 442-455

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cm.20456

Keywords

actin; Aip1; cell motility; chemotaxis; coronin; cytokinesis; Dictyostelium; phagocytosis

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MU1415/1-2, SFB 413, SPP 1128]
  2. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronin and actin-interacting protein 1 (Aip1) are actin-binding proteins that by different mechanisms inhibit actin polymerization or enhance the disassembly of actin filaments. Cells of Dictyostelium discoideum lacking both proteins are retarded in growth and early development and often fail to proceed to fruiting body formation. Coronin/Aip1-null cells show numerous surface protrusions enriched in filamentous actin and cofilin. We show that the double-null cells are characterized by an increase in filamentous actin that causes a thickening of the cell cortex. This imbalance has severe consequences for processes that rely on the dynamic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, such as cell motility, cytokinesis and endocytosis. Although cell motility is considerably slowed down, the double-mutant cells are still capable of orientating in a gradient of chemoattractant. The cytokinesis defect is caused by the lack of proper cleavage furrow formation, a defect that is partially rescued by low concentrations of latrunculin A, an inhibitor of actin polymerization. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the disassembly of the actin coat after phagocytic or macropinocytic uptake is significantly delayed in the double-mutant cells. Our results prove that coronin and Aip1 are important effectors that act together in maintaining the balance of actin polymerization and depolymerization in living cells. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available