4.0 Article

A normal colposcopy examination fails to provide psychological reassurance for women who have had low-grade abnormal cervical cytology

Journal

CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 178-187

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12173

Keywords

colposcopy; anxiety; depression; psychological wellbeing; cytology; cervical screening

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G9700808]
  2. NHS in England
  3. NHS in Scotland
  4. University of Aberdeen
  5. NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
  6. University of Nottingham
  7. Nottingham NHS, Nottingham, UK
  8. University of Dundee
  9. NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
  10. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
  11. National Cancer Registry, Cork, Ireland
  12. Bangor University, Bangor, UK
  13. University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
  14. MRC [G9700808] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Medical Research Council [G9700808] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveWorldwide, each year, large numbers of women are referred for colposcopy following low-grade abnormal cervical cytology. Many have no visible abnormality on examination. The risk of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 (CIN2/3) in these women is low. It is unknown whether, for women, a normal colposcopy resolves the anxiety which often follows the receipt of an abnormal cytology result. We investigated the prevalence of adverse psychological outcomes over 30months following a normal colposcopy. MethodsThis cohort study was nested within the UK TOMBOLA randomized controlled trial. Women aged 20-59years, with recent low-grade cytology, who had a satisfactory colposcopy examination and normal transformation zone, completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Process Outcome Specific Measure (POSM) at recruitment and during follow-up (12, 18, 24 and 30months post-recruitment). Outcomes included percentages reporting significant anxiety (HADS anxiety subscale score 11), significant depression (HADS depression subscale score 8) or worries about the result of the next cytology test, cervical cancer, having sex, future fertility and general health at each time point (point prevalence) and during follow-up (cumulative prevalence). ResultsThe study included 727 women. All psychological measures (except depression) had high prevalence at recruitment, falling substantially by 12months. During follow-up, the cumulative prevalence of significant anxiety was 27% and significant depression was 21%. The most frequently reported worry was that the next cytology test would be abnormal (cumulative prevalence of 71%; point prevalence of 50% at 12 and 18months). The cumulative prevalence values of worries about cervical cancer, having sex and future fertility were 33%, 20% and 16%, respectively. ConclusionsFor some women who have low-grade cytology, a normal colposcopy does not appear to provide psychological reassurance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available