4.2 Article

The phenotypic distribution and functional profile of tuberculin-specific CD4 T-cells characterizes different stages of TB infection

Journal

CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY
Volume 82B, Issue 6, Pages 369-371

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21041

Keywords

clinically active tuberculosis; latent tuberculosis infection; T-lymphocytes; CD154; CD27

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent publications have suggested that altered proportions of functional CD4 T-cell subsets correlate with active pulmonary TB. Also, CD27-expression on tuberculin-activated IFN-?+ CD4 T-cells is known to differ significantly between patients with active pulmonary TB and healthy TB-unexposed BCG vaccinees. Here, we explore links between CD4 T-cell phenotype, multiple functional subsets, and control of TB. Methods: We examined ex-vivo overnight tuberculin activated CD4 T-cells in regards to CD27-expression and the activation markers, CD154 upregulation, IFN-?, TNF-a, IL-2, and degranulation in 44 individuals, including cases of clinically active pulmonary TB, and hospital staff with prolonged TB exposure, some of whom had latent TB. Results: Active pulmonary TB generally showed an excess of TNF-a+ subsets over IFN-?+ subsets, paralleled by decreased CD27 expression on activated IFN-?+ or CD154+ CD4 T-cells. The single subset distinguishing best between active pulmonary TB and high TB exposure was CD154+/TNF-a+/ IFN-?-/IL-2-/degranulation- (AUROC 0.90). The ratio between the frequencies of TNF-a+/IFN-?+ CD4 T-cells was an effective alternative parameter (AUROC 0.87). Conclusions: Functional subsets and phenotype of tuberculin induced CD4 T-cells differ between stages of TB infection. Predominance of TNF-a+ CD4 T-cells in active infection suggests an increased effort of the immune system to contain disease. (c) 2012 International Clinical Cytometry Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available