Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis
Islam Y. Elgendy et al.
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY (2016)
The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
Joanna IntHout et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2014)
How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
Dan Jackson et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE (2010)
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
David Moher et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2009)
The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability
Taye H. Hamza et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
Rebecca DerSimonian et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS (2007)
Share Paper
