4.3 Article

Flow-cytometric measurement of respiratory burst in rat polymorphonuclear granulocytes: Comparison of four cell preparation procedures, and concentration-response evaluation of soluble stimulants

Journal

CYTOMETRY PART A
Volume 73A, Issue 7, Pages 643-650

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20539

Keywords

flow cytometry; rats; neutrophils; respiratory burst; tumor necrosis factor-alpha; lipopolysaccharides; N-formylmethionine leucyl-phenylalanine; phorbol-12-myristate-13acetate; concentration-response relationship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) contribute to organ injury in sepsis, stroke, and other diseases. Evaluation of the oxidative burst by flow cytometry (FCM) is frequently applied to examine PNIN status in humans, but rarely in rats. We established a method to assess granulocyte activation in rats by means of FCM analysis of oxidative burst. Two methods for PMN isolation involving Histopaque separation were investigated, and additionally two whole blood techniques. In addition, the concentration response relation of the stimulants fMLP, PMA, TNF-alpha, and LPS has been determined, both as sole stimulants and for priming. A novel technique with diluted rat whole blood proved to be most appropriate for PMN preparation. One micromolar PMA and fMLP, respectively, are effective concentrations for PMN stimulation in rat whole blood. Priming with 0.1 mu g/ml TNF-alpha and 1 mu g/ml LPS, respectively, resulted in optimal additional stimulation. This study defined the appropriate conditions for evaluating the reactive oxygen derivate production in rat PMNs by flow cytometry. The rapid, Simple, and reliable cell preparation procedure of whole blood dilution that preserves cell integrity and requires only small sample quantities. This is the first systematic dose-response evaluation of soluble stimulants of neutrophil respiratory burst in rats. (c) 2008 International Society for Analytical Cytology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available