4.6 Review

Type I interferon in neurological disease-The devil from within

Journal

CYTOKINE & GROWTH FACTOR REVIEWS
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 257-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.03.006

Keywords

Type I interferon; Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome; Inflammatory encephalopathy; Neurodegeneration; Animal models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The members of the type I interferon (IFN-I) family of cytokines are pleiotropic factors that have seminal roles in host defence, acting as antimicrobial and antitumor mediators as well as potent immunomodulatory factors that bridge the innate and adaptive immune responses. Despite these beneficial actions there is mounting evidence that link inappropriate or chronic production of IFN-I in the CNS to the development of a number of severe neuroinflammatory disorders. The most persuasive example is the genetically determined inflammatory encephalopathy, Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome (AGS) in which patients have chronically elevated IFN-alpha production in the CNS. The presentation of AGS can often mimic congenital viral infection, however, molecular genetic studies have identified mutations in six genes that can cause AGS, most likely via dysregulated nucleic acid metabolism and activation of the innate immune response leading to increased intrathecal production of IFN-alpha. The role of IFN-alpha as a pathogenic factor in AGS and other neurological disorders has gained considerable support from experimental studies. In particular, a transgenic mouse model with CNS-restricted production of IFN-alpha replicates many of the cardinal neuropathologic features of AGS and reveal IFN-I to be the devil from within, mediating molecular and cellular damage within the CNS. Thus, targeting IFN-I may be an effective strategy for the treatment of AGS as well as some other autoimmune and infectious neurological interferonopathies. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available