4.5 Article

Multiplex analysis of cytokines/chemokines as biomarkers that differentiate healthy contacts from tuberculosis patients in high endemic settings

Journal

CYTOKINE
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 747-754

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.12.031

Keywords

Tuberculosis; Biomarker; Contact specific fractions; Interleukin-6; Platelet derived growth factor

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differentiation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) from active disease is one of the crucial elements in the control of tuberculosis. Earlier in Indian population which is tuberculosis endemic, we identified that 10 Mycobacterium tuberculosis secreted protein fractions, induced IFN-gamma response only in healthy contacts of TB patients (HCs) and not in tuberculosis patients (TB). These fractions were termed as Contact Specific Fractions (CS fractions) and found useful for differentiating HC from TB. Proteomic analysis revealed that CS fractions have 16 different proteins, of which three were novel T cell antigens. Using these CS fractions as stimulants, earlier IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and IL-4 cytokine responses were studied. In the present study, in order to identify the other useful cytokine biomarkers that were differentially expressed between HC and TB, Cytokine/chemokine response to CS fractions were analyzed using multiplex cytokine assay system. This preliminary investigation in our tuberculosis endemic population showed six cytokine (G-CSF, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, and PDGF) and one receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) that were differentially expressed between HC and TB, for the first time. Especially IL-6 and PDGF were more promising biomarkers. IL-6 measurement identified seven as HC out of 10 HC analyzed. The measurement of PDGF identified eight as TB out of 10 TB tested. Studies are underway to further validate these biomarkers for the differentiation of LTBI from active tuberculosis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available