4.5 Article

Interlaboratory reproducibility of female genital tract cytokine measurements by Luminex: Implications for microbicide safety studies

Journal

CYTOKINE
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 430-434

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.06.011

Keywords

Cytokine measurement; Reproducibility; Multiplex methods; Cervicovaginal secretions; Microbicide studies

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [AI065309]
  3. National Cancer Institute [R37 CA051323]
  4. STI Clinical Trials Group (NIAID Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) [HHSN266200400074C]
  5. NIH/NCRR National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [UL1 RR024131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interlaboratory reproducibility of cytokine measurements from cervicovaginal samples by Luminex has not been reported. Using cervicovaginal lavage specimens collected on three study days from 12 women participating in a Phase I microbicide study, we measured a panel of eight cytokines in three independent laboratories. Four (IFN-gamma, IL-10, IL-17, and TNF) were below the limit of detection in the majority (85%) of samples in either two or all three laboratories, an observation that may guide analyte selection for future studies. Good interlaboratory agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, r > 0.7) in absolute levels was observed for IL-6, and IL-8, while poor agreement was seen for IFN-alpha 2 (r = 0.47). When considering within-subject change from baseline (pre-product, at study-day 0) to either post-product visit (study-days 7 and 14), IL-1 beta and IL-6 exhibited good interlaboratory agreement (r > 0.7), while IFN-alpha 2 and IL-8 did not. Future studies addressing the clinical utility of specific biomarkers of inflammation for microbicide trials should consider reproducibility in the context of defining biologically meaningful thresholds of change for candidate biomarkers, ensuring that such change can be reliably distinguished from background variability. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available