4.5 Article

Inhibited proliferation of human lung fibroblasts by LPS is through IL-6 and IL-8 release

Journal

CYTOKINE
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 289-295

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.02.018

Keywords

Human lung fibroblast; Lipopolysaccharide; Interleukin-6; Interleukin-8; Proliferation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81000013]
  2. Shanghai Education Commission [01SG06]
  3. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through the consideration of decreased proliferation of lung fibroblasts from subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the proinflammatory role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the COPD development, we hypothesized that LPS might inhibit proliferation in lung fibroblasts and the possible mechanism was investigated. Primary human lung fibroblasts were cultured from peripheral lung tissue and then treated with or without LPS. Proliferation was measured by AlamarBlue (R) assay. Levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-1 beta and IL-10 in the supernatants were measured by ELISA. The mRNA of histone deacetylases 2 (HDAC2) was analyzed using real-time PCR. LPS appeared to have a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on fibroblasts proliferation. The concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 in the treatment culture media were significantly increased, accompanied by a reduced mRNA expression of HDAC2. IL-6 or IL-8 itself led to the reduction of fibroblasts proliferation. Treatment with 1 ng/ml TNF-alpha in fibroblasts also caused a significant decrease in proliferation and an increase in the production of IL-8 and IL-6. Our data suggest that LPS can inhibit the proliferation of in vitro human lung fibroblasts at least through a production of IL-6 and IL-8. The cytokine response is related to the decreased HDAC2 transcription. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available