4.5 Article

TNFR and LTβR agonists induce follicle-associated epithelium and M cell specific genes in rat and human intestinal epithelial cells

Journal

CYTOKINE
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 69-76

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.05.001

Keywords

Lymphotoxin; Tumor necrosis factor; Mucosal immunity; Epithelium

Funding

  1. NIH [AI63426, AI73689]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation/Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

M cells assist mucosal immune surveillance by transcytosis of particles to underlying lymphoid tissue, but the mechanisms of M cell differentiation are poorly understood. To develop a better defined cell culture model of M cell differentiation, we treated human (Caco-2BBe) and rat (IEC-6) intestinal epithelial cell lines with lymphotoxin beta receptor (LT beta R) and TNF receptor (TNFR) agonists. Treated cells were studied for regulation of genes associated with M cell and follicle-associated epithelium (FAE). We found that LT beta R and TNFR agonists induce transcription of FAE-specific genes (Ccl20 and Lamb3) in Caco2-BBe cells and IEC-6 cells as well as rodent M cell specific genes such as Sgne-1/Scg5, Cldn4, and Gp2. The cytokines have distinct but complementary effects; TNFR agonists mainly induced FAE-specific genes, while the LT beta R agonist induced M cell specific genes. The combination of cytokines showed additive induction of the FAE-associated Ccl20, Lamb3 and a surprising induction of CD137/Tnfrsf9. On the other hand TNF agonists appeared to suppress expression of some LT beta R-induced genes. Functionally, cytokine treatment led to the reorganization of microvilli and Claudin-4 redistribution. These studies suggest complex interactions between these cytokines in the context of either inflammation or tissue differentiation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available