4.3 Review

A Comparison Between Plant Photosystem I and Photosystem II Architecture and Functioning

Journal

CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 296-331

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389203715666140327102218

Keywords

Plant photosystems; light harvesting complexes; energy transfer; electron transfer; photoprotection

Funding

  1. COST Action [TD1102]
  2. French National Research Agency [ANR-12-JSV8-0001-01]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-12-JSV8-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxygenic photosynthesis is indispensable both for the development and maintenance of life on earth by converting light energy into chemical energy and by producing molecular oxygen and consuming carbon dioxide. This latter process has been responsible for reducing the CO2 from its very high levels in the primitive atmosphere to the present low levels and thus reducing global temperatures to levels conducive to the development of life. Photosystem I and photosystem II are the two multi-protein complexes that contain the pigments necessary to harvest photons and use light energy to catalyse the primary photosynthetic endergonic reactions producing high energy compounds. Both photosystems are highly organised membrane supercomplexes composed of a core complex, containing the reaction centre where electron transport is initiated, and of a peripheral antenna system, which is important for light harvesting and photosynthetic activity regulation. If on the one hand both the chemical reactions catalysed by the two photosystems and their detailed structure are different, on the other hand they share many similarities. In this review we discuss and compare various aspects of the organisation, functioning and regulation of plant photosystems by comparing them for similarities and differences as obtained by structural, biochemical and spectroscopic investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available