4.5 Review

Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Neurogenic Pulmonary Edema

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 32, Issue 15, Pages 1135-1145

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3609

Keywords

baroreflex-induced bradycardia; blood pressure rise; blood volume redistribution; central nervous system; neurogenic pulmonary edema; spinal cord injury; sympathetic nervous system

Funding

  1. [GACR 304/12/0259]
  2. [RVO:67985823]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE) is a life-threatening complication of central nervous system (CNS) injuries. This review summarizes current knowledge about NPE etiology and pathophysiology with an emphasis on its experimental models, including our spinal cord compression model. NPE may develop as a result of activation of specific CNS trigger zones located in the brainstem, leading to a rapid sympathetic discharge, rise in systemic blood pressure, baroreflex-induced bradycardia, and enhanced venous return resulting in pulmonary vascular congestion characterized by interstitial edema, intra-alveolar accumulation of transudate, and intra-alveolar hemorrhages. The potential etiological role of neurotransmitter changes in NPE trigger zones leading to enhanced sympathetic nerve activity is discussed. Degree of anesthesia is a crucial determinant for the extent of NPE development in experimental models because of its influence on sympathetic nervous system activity. Sympathetic hyperactivity is based on the major activation of either ascending spinal pathways by spinal cord injury or NPE trigger zones by increased intracranial pressure. Attenuation of sympathetic nerve activity or abolition of reflex bradycardia completely prevent NPE development in our experimental model. Suggestions for future research into NPE pathogenesis as well as therapeutic potential of particular drugs and interventions are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available