4.4 Review

Churg-Strauss syndrome: evidence for disease subtypes?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 21-28

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328333390b

Keywords

ANCA; asthma; Churg-Strauss syndrome; eosinophils; vasculitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is a rare systemic small-vessel necrotizing vasculitis. Its main clinical characteristics, some potentially life-threatening, are now well known, as are its usual successive phases, from allergic rhinitis to asthma, and finally vasculitis. Conversely, physiopathogenetic mechanisms are not completely elucidated and clearly multiple thereby suggesting the existence of different disease subtypes. Recent findings Almost 40% of CSS patients have circulating antineutrophil cytoplasm autoantibodies (ANCAs), mostly directed against myeloperoxidase. ANCA-positive patients suffer more frequently from renal disease, peripheral nervous system involvement and/or alveolar hemorrhage, whereas frequent cardiac involvement, lung infiltrates and/or systemic manifestations are more common in those who are ANCA-negative. However, their respective global outcomes do not clearly differ. Patients might also be categorized according to other, more subtile clinical, radiological and/or biological parameters, for example, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities or genetic background. Summary Because of its practical and therapeutic repercussions, the priority remains the prompt, relatively easy identification of the most severely affected patients at CSS diagnosis, before searching for and trying to classify subsets. Large, collaborative studies are needed to determine whether other subgroups might be associated with outcomes and warrant different, and possibly new, therapeutic strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available