4.4 Review

Clinical value of blocking IL-6 receptor

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 224-230

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283295fec

Keywords

interleukin-6; joint destruction; juvenile idiopathic arthritis; rheumatoid arthritis; tocilizumab

Categories

Funding

  1. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a multifunctional cytokine that regulates inflammatory response and immune reaction. Overproduction of IL-6 is pathologically involved in inflammatory autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and therefore, blocking IL-6 activity is one of therapeutic options for these diseases. Tocilizumab is a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibody and inhibits IL-6 activity. There is now accumulating evidence that tocilizumab is therapeutically effective for patients with RA and other inflammatory autoimmune diseases. This article reviews the clinical value of blocking IL-6R. Recent findings Tocilizumab, as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate, has been shown to be effective for RA patients with insufficient efficacy to methotrexate or other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. These findings of tocilizumab have been expanded to patients refractory to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Tocilizumab also retards the progression of structural joint damage. Furthermore, a 5-year long-term safety and efficacy has been shown. Tocilizumab is also a promising therapeutic option for other rheumatic diseases such as systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still's disease, and Takayasu arteritis. Summary Blocking IL-6R with tocilizumab represents a promising new treatment for RA and other inflammatory diseases. Large registry data will warrant the safety profile of tocilizumab.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available