4.1 Article

EMT and interstitial lung disease: a mysterious relationship

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 517-523

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3283566721

Keywords

EMT; ER stress; interstitial lung disease; IPF; lineage tracing

Funding

  1. Hastings Foundation
  2. Whittier Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [RO1HL089445, R37HL062569]
  4. Japanese Respiratory Foundation
  5. Pfizer Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Pathogenesis of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has largely been investigated in the context of the most frequent ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We review studies of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and discuss its potential contribution to collagen-producing (myo)fibroblasts in IPF. Recent findings Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress leading to epithelial apoptosis has been reported as a potential etiologic factor in fibrosis. Recent studies further suggest EMT as a link between ER stress and fibrosis. Combinatorial interactions among Smad3, beta-catenin and other transcriptional co-activators at the alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) promoter provide direct evidence for crosstalk between transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta) and beta-catenin pathways during EMT. Lineage tracing yielded conflicting results, with two recent studies supporting and one opposing a role for EMT in lung fibrosis. Summary Advances have been made in elucidating causes and mechanisms of EMT, potentially leading to new treatment options, although contributions of EMT to lung fibrosis in vivo remain controversial. In addition to EMT providing a direct source of (myo)fibroblasts, expression of mesenchymal markers may reflect epithelial injury, in which case inhibition of EMT might be deleterious. EMT-derived cells may also contribute to aberrant epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk that promotes fibrogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available