4.1 Review

Predicting asthma exacerbations in children

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 63-69

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834db288

Keywords

asthma exacerbations; biomarkers; childhood asthma; prediction; risk factors

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [HL079966]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review critically assesses recently published literature on predicting asthma exacerbations in children, while also providing general recommendations for future research in this field. Recent findings Current evidence suggests that every effort should be made to provide optimal treatment to achieve adequate asthma control, as this will significantly reduce the risk of severe disease exacerbations. Children who have had at least one asthma exacerbation in the previous year are at highest risk for subsequent exacerbations, regardless of disease severity and/or control. Although several tools and biomarkers to predict asthma exacerbations have been recently developed, these approaches need further validation and/or have only had partial success in identifying children at risk. Summary Although considerable progress has been made, much remains to be done. Future studies should clearly differentiate severe asthma exacerbations due to inadequate asthma control from those occurring in children whose asthma is well controlled, utilize standardized definitions of asthma exacerbations, and use a systematic approach to identify the best predictors after accounting for the multiple dimensions of the problem. Our ability to correctly predict the development of severe asthma exacerbations in an individual child should improve in parallel with increased knowledge and/or understanding of the complex interactions among genetic, environmental (e. g. viral infections) and lifestyle (e. g. adherence to treatment) factors underlying these events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available