4.1 Review

Stepping down asthma treatment: how and when

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 70-75

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834db017

Keywords

asthma; inhaled corticosteroids; long-acting beta agonists; step-down

Funding

  1. CDC, NIOSH [1E11OH009630]
  2. NIH, NIEHS [5T32ES07267-20]
  3. NIH, NEIHS [5RO1 ES10187-10]
  4. American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers (PI)
  5. ALAACRC
  6. American Lung Association through Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Guidelines suggest that asthma medication should be reduced once asthma control is sustained. Moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can typically be reduced, but questions remain about the lowest effective ICS dose and the role of non-ICS controllers in treatment reduction. Long-acting beta agonist (LABA) safety concerns have created controversy about how to step down patients on ICS/LABA therapy. This review will focus on the current status of these issues. Recent findings Intermittent ICS treatment, often in fixed combination with short-acting beta agonist, is an emerging strategy for control of mild asthma. Addition of leukotriene modifiers, LABAs, and omalizumab to ICS can allow for reduced ICS dosing. Doses of ICS that control symptoms may be inadequate to control exacerbations. Reducing ICS dose before discontinuing LABAs may be the more effective approach for patients on combination therapy. Summary Use of non-ICS controllers allows for ICS dose reduction with superior outcomes. Tapering of ICS prior to LABA discontinuation may be the favored approach for patients on ICS/LABA therapy, but an understanding of long-term outcomes and further safety data are required. The lowest ICS dose that adequately controls both asthma impairment and risk remains to be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available