4.4 Review

How successful are first episode programs? A review of the evidence for specialized assertive early intervention

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 167-172

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000052

Keywords

Assertive Community Treatment model; early intervention; first episode psychosis; randomized clinical trial; schizophrenia

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Ministry of Health [96-0770-71]
  2. Danish Ministry of Social Affairs
  3. University of Copenhagen
  4. Copenhagen Hospital Cooperation
  5. Danish Medical Research Council [9601612, 9900734]
  6. LundbeckFoundation
  7. TrygFoundation
  8. Capital Region of Denmark
  9. Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark
  10. Slagtermester Worzners Foundation
  11. Stanley Wada Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewIt has been hypothesized that the first 5 years after first episode of psychosis are a critical period with opportunities for ameliorating the course of illness. On the basis of this rationale, specialized assertive early intervention services were developed. We wanted to investigate the evidence basis for such interventions.Recent findingsThe evidence for the effectiveness of specialized assertive early intervention services is mainly based on one large randomized clinical trial, the OPUS trial, but it is supported by the findings in smaller trials, such as the Lambeth Early Onset trial, the Croydon Outreach and Assertive Support Team trial and the Norwegian site of Optimal Treatment trial. There are positive effects on psychotic and negative symptoms, on substance abuse and user satisfaction, but the clinical effects are not sustainable when patients are transferred to standard treatment. However, the positive effects on service use and ability to live independently seem to be durable.SummaryImplementation of specialized assertive early intervention services is recommended, but the evidence basis needs to be strengthened through replication in large high-quality trials. Recommendation regarding the duration of treatment must await results of ongoing trials comparing 2 years of intervention with extended treatment periods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available