4.4 Article

Current developments and controversies: does the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) modulate the association between stress and depression?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 582-587

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833f0e3a

Keywords

depression; gene x environment interaction; serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR); stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Human observational studies have shown that, in interaction with life stress, the short or S-allele of the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) is associated with an enhanced risk for depression. However, this gene-by-environment interaction (G x E) has recently been questioned by two meta-analyses. We aim to provide an overview and appraisal of recent developments and controversies. Recent findings The statistical approach of the meta-analyses aimed at a very strict replication of the initial finding and, accordingly, included only a minority of all available studies. Furthermore, the negative results of the meta-analyses appear to be predominantly driven by a few large studies that used retrospective, self-report measures of life stress. In contrast, among 19 studies using interview-based or more objective measures of stress, there were 13 replications, five part-replications and only one nonreplication. Finally, a broader approach based on evidence from different research fields and methodologies supports a 5-HTTLPR by stress interaction. Summary Whereas there is no doubt that the meta-analyses are methodologically sound, it appears that this technique is only in part suitable for appraising all of the available evidence. Furthermore, convergent evidence is accumulating from different research fields that 5-HTTLPR is indeed closely associated with different biological pathways associated with stress regulation and depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available