4.4 Article

Perspectives of intellectual disability in Asia: epidemiology, policy, and services for children and adults

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 462-468

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832ec056

Keywords

Asia; epidemiology; intellectual disability; policies; services

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Given the scarcity of Asian literature on intellectual disability, the aim of this review article is to shed light on the epidemiology, policy, and services for children and adults with intellectual disability in Asia. Recent findings The prevalence of intellectual disability across Asia appears to be consistent with western estimates at 0.06-1.3%, with the exception being China at 6.68%. In the only two studies of m_ntal health conducted in Asia, the prevalence ranged from 4.4 to 48.3%. Some of the common physical health problems among Singaporean adults with intellectual disability are obesity, high blood pressure, and high blood cholesterol. All Asian countries/territories have at least one law or policy that promotes the well being of persons with disabilities, with Japan being the only country that has a law specifically enacted for persons with intellectual disability. Although there is an array of services being offered for children and adults with intellectual disability across south-east Asia, there is also a variation in the proportion of countries that offer these services. Summary Overall, the challenge for Asia will be to develop a localized base of knowledge by conducting epidemiological studies, modeling after evidence-based practices, and evaluating its effectiveness. By adopting a scientific approach and formal publication of data, intellectual disability standards can be evaluated, managed, and improved in a systematic manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available