4.4 Review

Chemical mixtures and children's health

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 223-229

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000067

Keywords

chemical mixtures; children; epidemiology; metals; pediatric

Categories

Funding

  1. NIEHS [K99 ES022986, P42 ES016454, ES016454, ES000002]
  2. [R01 ES013744]
  3. [R01 ES014930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewHumans are routinely exposed to multiple chemicals simultaneously or sequentially. There is evidence that the toxicity of individual chemicals may depend on the presence of other chemicals. Studies on chemical mixtures are limited, however, because of the lack of sufficient exposure data, limited statistical power, and difficulty in the interpretation of multidimensional interactions. This review summarizes the recent literature examining chemical mixtures and pediatric health outcomes, with an emphasis on metal mixtures.Recent findingsSeveral studies report significant interactions between metals in relation to pediatric health outcomes. Two prospective studies found interactive effects of early-life lead and manganese exposures on cognition. In two different cohorts, interactions between lead and cadmium exposures were reported on reproductive hormone levels and on neurodevelopment. Effects of lead exposure on impulsive behavior and cognition were modified by mercury exposure in studies from Canada and Denmark. However, there is little consistency related to exposure indicators and statistical approaches for evaluating interaction.SummarySeveral studies suggest that metals interact to cause health effects that are different from exposure to each metal alone. Despite the nearly infinite number of possible chemical combinations, mixtures research represents real-life exposure scenarios and warrants more attention, particularly in the context of uniquely vulnerable children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available