4.4 Review

Antivascular endothelial growth factor for retinopathy of prematurity

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 182-187

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32832925f9

Keywords

intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin); light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER) therapy; retinopathy of prematurity (ROP); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); vitrectomy

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY 10608] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review will discuss a potentially more effective treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with fewer acute and long-term complications. Avastin (bevacizumab) therapy is a promising anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) administered directly into the vitreous. Recent findings Recent reports detail the use of Avastin alone, and in combination with light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER) therapy and vitrectomy, for ROP stages 3, 4, and 5. Currently, one clinical trial is studying Avastin alone for acute vision-threatening ROP stage 3 in zone I and posterior zone II without LASER therapy. Another clinical trial is investigating Avastin following LASER therapy for recurrent ROP stages 4 and 5. Summary Treatment for ROP has evolved from later, more destructive (cryotherapy) to earlier, less destructive (LASER therapy) peripheral retinal ablation. If evidence-based data supports early findings, the use of Avastin may be recommended without the need for ablative LASER therapy and before retinal detachment develops. Avastin will be especially useful for ROP stage 3 cases with hemorrhage decreasing retinal visualization, rigid pupils, intravitreal neovascularization with early or developing (minimal) fibrous membranes, or aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP). These cases all continue to have poor outcomes with LASER therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available