4.4 Article

FRET based ratiometric Ca2+ imaging to investigate immune-mediated neuronal and axonal damage processes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 249, Issue -, Pages 8-15

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.04.005

Keywords

EAE/MS; Two-photon laser scanning microscopy; Intravital microscopy; FRET; Ca2+ imaging neurodegeneration

Funding

  1. Gemeinnutzige Hertie-Stiftung
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB-TRR128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Irreversible axonal and neuronal damage are the correlate of disability in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS). A sustained increase of cytoplasmic free [Ca2+] is a common upstream event of many neuronal and axonal damage processes and could represent an early and potentially reversible step. New method: We propose a method to specifically analyze the neurodegenerative aspects of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) imaging of neuronal and axonal Ca2+ dynamics by two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM). Results: Using the genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor TN-XXL expressed in neurons and their corresponding axons, we confirm the increase of cytoplasmic free [Ca2+] in axons and neurons of autoimmune inflammatory lesions compared to those in non-inflamed brains. We show that these relative [Ca2+] increases were associated with immune-neuronal interactions. Comparison with existing methods: In contrast to Ca2+-sensitive dyes the use of a genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor allows reliable intraaxonal free [Ca2+] measurements in living anesthetized mice in health and disease. This method detects early axonal damage processes in contrast to e.g. cell/axon morphology analysis, that rather detects late signs of neurodegeneration. Conclusions: Thus, we describe a method to analyze and monitor early neuronal damage processes in the brain in vivo. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available