4.4 Article

Recording human cortical population spikes non-invasively - An EEG tutorial

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages 74-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.013

Keywords

Evoked potentials; High-frequency oscillations; Single-trial analysis; Somatosensory system; Spatial filtering

Funding

  1. Bernstein Focus: Neurotechnology Berlin (German Ministry of Education and Research) [01GQ0851, B1]
  2. Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin (German Ministry of Education and Research) [01GQ1001C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Non-invasively recorded somatosensory high-frequency oscillations (sHFOs) evoked by electric nerve stimulation are markers of human cortical population spikes. Previously, their analysis was based on massive averaging of EEG responses. Advanced neurotechnology and optimized off-line analysis can enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of sHFOs, eventually enabling single-trial analysis. Methods: The rationale for developing dedicated low-noise EEG technology for sHFOs is unfolded. Detailed recording procedures and tailored analysis principles are explained step-by-step. Source codes in Matlab and Python are provided as supplementary material online. Results: Combining synergistic hardware and analysis improvements, evoked sHFOs at around 600 Hz ('sigma-bursts') can be studied in single-trials. Additionally, optimized spatial filters increase the signal-to-noise ratio of components at about 1 kHz ('kappa-bursts') enabling their detection in non-invasive surface EEG. Conclusions: sHFOs offer a unique possibility to record evoked human cortical population spikes non-invasively. The experimental approaches and algorithms presented here enable also non-specialized EEG laboratories to combine measurements of conventional low-frequency EEG with the analysis of concomitant cortical population spike responses. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available