4.1 Review

Donor-specific antibodies in allograft recipients: etiology, impact and therapeutic approaches

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 591-597

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000128

Keywords

antibody-mediated rejection; donor-specific antibodies; human leukocyte antigen sensitization; intravenous immunoglobulin; rituximab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure. However, despite significant advancements in detection of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies, improved immunosuppression and patient management, the durability of this life-saving therapy has not improved. This results in increased morbidity and mortality as well as increased cost to the healthcare system. Recent findings The identification of immune-pathogenic pathways responsible for allograft failure coupled with targeted interventions will represent one of the most important future objectives of transplant immunologist and physicians. The development of sensitive donor-specific antibody (DSA) detection techniques and advancements in renal allograft pathology assessments have revealed the importance of humoral immunity in mediating allograft failure. This is especially true for complement activating DSAs (C1q+). Summary Our current understanding suggests that reduction of immunosuppressive medications or medication nonadherence is now the major causes of DSA development and attendant pathology. Other important factors in initiation of de-novo DSA production include viral infections, human leukocyte antigen-DR/DQ mismatches and autoimmune diseases. Therapies aimed at antibody reduction, B-cell depletion and modification of the complement system will likely usher in new therapeutic approaches for prevention and treatment of DSA-mediated allograft dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available