4.1 Review

HLA incompatible renal transplantation

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 386-392

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e328356132b

Keywords

complement inhibition; desensitization; donor-specific antibodies; human leukocyte antigens incompatible transplantation; kidney-paired donation

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [RC1 DK086731]
  2. Charles T. Bauer Foundation
  3. Alexion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major public health problem that limits access to renal transplantation for 30% of the patients awaiting a kidney transplant. This review describes the transplantation modalities available to the sensitized patient and discusses aspects of the donor/recipient phenotypes that determine the most suitable option for a particular patient. Recent findings Patients, who undergo desensitization have a significant survival benefit compared with similar patients, who either remain on dialysis or wait for a compatible donor. The initial donor-specific antibody (DSA) strength is the best predictor of outcome and cost of desensitization. In small, uncontrolled single center trials, complement inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors and anti-CD20 have been used to both prevent and reverse antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Summary With new agents being introduced into the armamentarium, which have not undergone rigorous investigation, it is important to emphasize that plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, increased sharing, and kidney-paired donation are very effective strategies for transplanting sensitized patients. However, a significant population of patients will not benefit from either kidney-paired donation or desensitization and will require a hybrid technique in which the goal of matching is to reduce the strength of the DSA to facilitate desensitization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available