4.1 Review

Human regulatory macrophages as a cell-based medicinal product

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 48-54

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e32834ee64a

Keywords

cell therapy; immunosuppression; regulatory macrophage

Funding

  1. EU [260687]
  2. RISET Consortium
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GE-1188/1-1]
  4. European Society of Organ Transplantation and American Society of Transplant Surgeons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review To consolidate our basic scientific and technological appreciation of human regulatory macrophages (M reg) as a cell-based medicinal product for use as an adjunct immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplantation. Recent findings Building on the original observation that crude preparations of IFN-g-stimulated allogeneic macrophages prolong allograft survival in experimental animals, we have arrived at a detailed understanding of the derivation, phenotype and T-cell-suppressive potential of a population of in-vitro-derived human macrophages, which have been designated M regs. This basic scientific knowledge has inspired methodological advances in M reg manufacture, leading to a purer and more homogeneous cell product. In turn, cells produced by these improved protocols have been applied in the clinic, so completing a cycle of technological development. Studying the migration and physiological impact of M reg administration in patients provides a measure of reassurance that the procedure is well tolerated. Cutting-edge strategies to assess the immunological status of solid organ transplant recipients allow the biological effects of M reg treatment to be monitored. Summary A view of the human M reg as a novel, stringently defined medicinal product is presented, opening exciting possibilities for its future investigation as a therapy in solid organ transplantation and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available