4.7 Article

Integration of Purkinje Cell Inhibition by Cerebellar Nucleo-Olivary Neurons

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 544-549

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3583-14.2015

Keywords

cerebellum; deep cerebellar nuclei; inferior olive; IPSC; IPSP

Categories

Funding

  1. [NIH-NS39395]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurons in the cerebellar cortex, cerebellar nuclei, and inferior olive (IO) form a trisynaptic loop critical for motor learning. IO neurons excite Purkinje cells via climbing fibers and depress their parallel fiber inputs. Purkinje cells inhibit diverse cells in the cerebellar nuclei, including small GABAergic nucleo-olivary neurons that project to the IO. To investigate how these neurons integrate synaptic signals from Purkinje cells, we retrogradely labeled nucleo-olivary cells in the contralateral interpositus and lateral nuclei with cholera toxin subunit B-Alexa Fluor 488 and recorded their electrophysiological properties in cerebellar slices from weanling mice. Nucleo-olivary cells fired action potentials over a relatively narrow dynamic range (maximal rate, similar to 70 spikes/s), unlike large cells that project to premotor areas (maximal rate, similar to 400 spikes/s). GABAA receptor-mediated IPSCs evoked by electrical or optogenetic stimulation of Purkinje cells were more than 10-fold slower in nucleo-olivary cells (decay time, similar to 25 ms) than in large cells (similar to 2 ms), and repetitive stimulation at 20 - 150 Hz evoked greatly summating IPSCs. Nucleo-olivary firing rates varied inversely with IPSP frequency, and the timing of Purkinje IPSPs and nucleo-olivary spikes was uncorrelated. These attributes contrast with large cells, whose brief IPSCs and rapid firing rates can permit well timed postinhibitory spiking. Thus, the intrinsic and synaptic properties of these two projection neurons from the cerebellar nuclei tailor them for differential integration and transmission of their Purkinje cell input.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available