4.2 Review

Aspirin in gastrointestinal oncology: new data on an old friend

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 441-447

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000098

Keywords

aspirin; chemoprevention; colorectal cancer; gastro-oesophageal cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. MRC [MC_U122861325] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Cancer Research UK [15015] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U122861325] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [12/01/38] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to assess recent evidence that demonstrates that aspirin has the potential to be an effective preventive and therapeutic agent in gastrointestinal malignancy. Recent findings Long-term follow-up of previous randomized trials of aspirin show that it decreases cancer incidence and mortality with the greatest effects seen on cancers that arise from the gastrointestinal tract. Reduction in distant metastasis and improvements in cancer outcomes appear within 5 years of randomization indicating that aspirin affects tumour growth or the development and spread of metastases from existing cancers or both. In Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer), aspirin reduces cancer incidence and should be considered standard care. Mutations in the PIK3CA gene may be a potential predictive marker of response to aspirin after a cancer diagnosis, though pharmacological considerations suggest that platelets may be central to the antitumour efficacy of aspirin. Summary These findings have re-awakened interest in the role of aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer and in the treatment of cancer. Randomized controlled trials are underway to assess the role of aspirin within the treatment algorithms of several solid common cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available