4.2 Review

Venous thromboembolism in the hematologic malignancies

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 702-710

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283592331

Keywords

acute leukemia; heparins; lymphoma; multiple myeloma; thrombophophylaxis; venous thromboembolism

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG 10558, 12237]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review summarizes the current knowledge of the epidemiology, prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma or acute leukemia. Recent findings Hematologic malignancies are associated with a high risk of thrombotic complications. The incidence of these events is greatly variable and is influenced by many factors, including the type and the stage of disease, antitumor therapies, and the use of central venous device (CVD). Epidemiological data allow an estimate of the incidence of VTE in acute leukemia, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. The effect of chemotherapy on the incidence of thrombosis is particularly evident in acute leukemia as it causes the exacerbation of the clotting/bleeding syndrome typical of this disease. The role of chemotherapy is also relevant in lymphoma, and in multiple myeloma, in which the use of immunomodulating agents, in combination with chemotherapy and steroids significantly increases the risk of VTE. Summary Thrombotic complications have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality of hematological cancer patients, therefore, in this setting, the issue of thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE is important. However, no clear recommendation in these conditions is available, with the exception of multiple myeloma. Large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the best practice for prevention and treatment of VTE in these types of malignant diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available