4.2 Review

Molecular heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer and its clinical implications

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 566-577

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834bf8ae

Keywords

basal-like breast cancer; heterogeneity; target identification; triple-negative breast cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Breakthrough Breast Cancer
  2. Sarah Greene Tribute Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by a lack of expression of hormone receptors, oestrogen and progesterone, as well as human epidermal factor receptor 2. This review focuses on the increasing understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of TNBC subtypes and the therapeutic implications of this subclassification. Recent findings Emerging evidence clearly indicates that TNBC is a heterogeneous disease with varying prognosis according to clinical, pathological and genetic factors. Some distinct histological special types within this clinically defined collection of entities have been shown to have a particularly good prognosis (e.g. medullary carcinomas), and others very poor outcome (e.g. metaplastic carcinomas), whereas the broader immunohistochemically defined 'core-basal-like' or gene expression defined 'basal' groups generally have a poor prognosis. This molecular subclassification has implicated several biological processes as potential therapeutic targets: the DNA damage response, drivers of deregulated proliferation, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immune deregulation. Summary Molecular stratification of these prognostic groups has been critical in identifying novel therapeutic targets for future drug development. The development of poly-(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors for BRCA1-mutation carriers with TNBC has led the ongoing efforts to translate fundamental biological insights into improved therapies for a difficult-to-treat breast cancer subgroup.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available