4.2 Review

T-cell immunotherapy for malignant glioma: toward a combined approach

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 604-610

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32833dead8

Keywords

brain tumors; glioma; glioma vaccines; immunotherapy; T lymphocytes

Categories

Funding

  1. Swiss National Foundation
  2. la Ligue genevoise contre le cancer
  3. Fondation Lionel Perrier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Immunotherapies using T lymphocytes are now considered as promising approaches for treating malignant glioma patients. This review discusses how basic understanding of antitumor T-cell responses in the brain are now leading to the rational planning of such novel therapeutic modalities. Recent findings Clinical trials show that therapeutic vaccination with defined glioma antigens or dendritic cells pulsed with glioma lysates is feasible and generally well tolerated, but clinical efficacy has yet to be demonstrated in randomized trials. Preclinical data have established that effector T cells can be engineered to more efficiently recognize tumor cells via high-affinity T-cell receptors or chimeric antibody-like receptors. Animal studies have demonstrated that glioma immunotherapy is enhanced if immunosuppressive molecules (including transforming growth factor-beta) and glioma infiltrating regulatory T cells are inactivated. Clinical trials are under way assessing transforming growth factor-beta2 antisense oligonucleotides and regulatory T cell depletion. Combination of any of the above approaches with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is strongly supported by animal and clinical observations. Summary Future T-cell immunotherapies will combine different strategies to deliver potent T cells to the glioma bed. The synergy of immunotherapies with radiotherapy and chemotherapy requires optimization, but it is now clear that these modalities are partners and not enemies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available