4.2 Review

The immunogenicity of tumor cell death

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 71-76

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32831bc375

Keywords

anthracyclines; calreticulin; cancer immunity

Categories

Funding

  1. Ligue contre le Cancer
  2. European Commission
  3. Institut National contre le Cancer (INCa)
  4. EMBO
  5. INSERM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review It is an ongoing conundrum under which circumstances cellular demise induces an immune response and whether apoptotic or necrotic cells are intrinsically immunogenic or tolerogenic. This review summarizes recent insights in the immunogenicity of dying tumor cells. Recent findings Although apoptosis appears to be morphologically homogeneous, recent evidence suggests that the preapoptotic surface exposure of calreticulin (CRT) may have a profound impact on the immune response. Moreover, the release of high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) during late apoptosis promotes antigen processing by dendritic cells and hence contributes to efficient antigen presentation and cytotoxic T-cell activation. HMGB1 is sensed by TLR4 on dendritic cells, and loss-of-function alleles of TILR4 abolish anticancer immune response and accelerate tumor progression. Summary A combination of signals elicits an efficient immune response against tumor cells that are dying in response to anthracyclines or ionizing irradiation. During early apoptosis, caspase activation and endoplasmic reticulum stress facilitate the surface exposure of immunogenic effectors followed by the release of soluble factors that are indispensable for effective immune response. Failure of tumor cells to expose/secrete such immunogenic factors and/or failure of the immune system to sense such effectors may compromise the efficacy of conventional anticancer therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available