4.1 Article

The role of laparoscopic myomectomy in the management of uterine fibroids

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 273-277

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a245

Keywords

laparoscopic myomectomy; minimally invasive surgery; uterine fibroids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Laparoscopic myomectomy has been described as comparable to open myomectomy in terms of fertility and obstetrical outcome with decreased intraoperative bleeding and postoperative disability. Despite this, laparoscopic myomectomy is not widely used reportedly due to lack of experience. This article presents our technique for laparoscopic myomectomy and assesses the current evidence-based literature for the use of this minimally invasive procedure in benign gynecological practice. Recent findings Literature continues to support the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic women desiring to preserve their fertility. Alternatively, laparoscopically assisted myomectomy has been suggested when wider access is needed to perform the procedure. This variant of the technique allows palpating the uterus and does not require laparoscopic suturing skills. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy currently has limited advantage over conventional laparoscopy due to longer operative time, loss of tactile sensation necessary to detect intramural myomas and high cost. Single-port surgery is a new promising approach, but still requires extensive investigation to determine whether it has significant benefits over conventional techniques. Summary Laparoscopic myomectomy cases are mostly doable, but may become difficult if bleeding problems occur. Extended operative times may be required for morcellation and extensive laparoscopic suturing. Gynecologists need to improve their laparoscopic skills, as minimally invasive surgery is becoming the sine qua non of a modern surgeon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available