4.7 Article

An Endocytic Scaffolding Protein together with Synapsin Regulates Synaptic Vesicle Clustering in the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 44, Pages 14756-14770

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1675-15.2015

Keywords

Drosophila neuromuscular junction; scaffolding proteins; synapse; synapsin; synaptic vesicles; vesicle clustering

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [HEALTH-F2-2009-242167]
  2. Parkinsonfonden, Hjarnfonden
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P40OD018537]
  6. NIH [2P40OD010949-10A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many endocytic proteins accumulate in the reserve pool of synaptic vesicles (SVs) in synapses and relocalize to the endocytic periactive zone during neurotransmitter release. Currently little is known about their functions outside the periactive zone. Here we show that in the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the endocytic scaffolding protein Dap160 colocalizes during the SV cycle and forms a functional complex with the SV-associated phosphoprotein synapsin, previously implicated in SV clustering. This direct interaction is strongly enhanced under phosphorylation-promoting conditions and is essential for proper localization of synapsin at NMJs. In a dap160 rescue mutant lacking the interaction between Dap160 and synapsin, perturbed reclustering of SVs during synaptic activity is observed. Our data indicate that in addition to the function in endocytosis, Dap160 is a component of a network of protein-protein interactions that serves for clustering of SVs in conjunction with synapsin. During the SV cycle, Dap160 interacts with synapsin dispersed from SVs and helps direct synapsin back to vesicles. The proteins function in synergy to achieve efficient clustering of SVs in the reserve pool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available