4.5 Review

New management algorithms in multiple sclerosis

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 246-259

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000096

Keywords

disease-modifying drugs; multiple sclerosis; oral therapies; treatment algorithm

Funding

  1. Biogen Idec
  2. Bayer Schering
  3. Merck Serono
  4. Sanofi-Aventis
  5. Novartis
  6. Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society
  7. Danish Medical Research Council
  8. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewOur current treatment algorithms include only IFN- and glatiramer as available first-line disease-modifying drugs and natalizumab and fingolimod as second-line therapies. Today, 10 drugs have been approved in Europe and nine in the United States making the choice of therapy more complex. The purpose of the review has been to work out new management algorithms for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis including new oral therapies and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.Recent findingsRecent large placebo-controlled trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have shown efficacy of new oral disease-modifying drugs, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, with similar or better efficacy than the injectable disease-modifying drugs, IFN- and glatiramer acetate. In addition, the new oral drugs seem to have a favorable safety profile. Further, the monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab, which in clinical trials has shown superiority to subcutaneous IFN- 1a, has been approved in Europe, but not yet in the United States.SummaryIn de novo-treated patients, the injectables, IFN- and glatiramer acetate, will to a great extent be replaced by the new orals, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide. However, patients who are stable on an injectable with no or minor side-effects could continue their current therapy. Alemtuzumab should be used as a second-line therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available