4.5 Article

Cytokine networks in multiple sclerosis: lost in translation

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 205-211

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283391feb

Keywords

cytokines; experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; innate immunity; multiple sclerosis; T helper cells

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. National Center for Competence in Research (NCCR-Neuro)
  3. Swiss MS-Society
  4. U.S.-National MS Society
  5. Merck-Serono-Geneva
  6. Forschungskredit of the University of Zurich
  7. Gemeinnutzige Hertie-Stiftung [2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review will discuss aspects of cytokine networks in neuroinflammatory diseases and attempt to provide some explanation for our failures and successes in translating preclinical data to benefit patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We will discuss innate cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor a and interferon (IFN) beta and will then go on to cover recent findings on the role of interleukin-23 and the so-called T(H)17 cells and how they are implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammation. Recent findings Even though IFN-beta has been used for the treatment of MS for many years, it is only recently that the mechanistic underpinnings of the IFN-beta-mediated immune modulation was discovered in preclinical models. The timeline is at odds with the idea that preclinical data should shape the design of therapeutic strategies in the clinic. Conversely, the discovery of the so-called T(H)17 cells and their association with neuroinflammation has broken the dogma that IFN-gamma-producing T(H)1 cells have the exclusive capacity to invade and destroy the central nervous system tissue. So why then did a clinical trial targeting the T(H)17-promoting cytokine interleukin-23 fail? Summary Preclinical studies using the animal models for MS have yielded promising results, but unfortunately the translation into the clinic is often disappointing. The reason for this may be the complex nature of the pathogenesis of autoimmune neuroinflammation, but more often an oversimplified interpretation of preclinical observations appears to hinder our progress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available