4.5 Review

Consciousness supporting networks

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 239-244

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.003

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  2. European Commission
  3. James McDonnell Foundation
  4. European Space Agency
  5. Mind Science Foundation
  6. French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action
  7. Public Utility Foundation 'Universite Europeenne du Travail'
  8. Fondazione Europea di Ricerca Biomedica
  9. University Hospital of Liege

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional neuroimaging shows that patients with disorders of consciousness exhibit disrupted system-level functional connectivity. Unresponsive/vegetative state patients preserve wakefulness networks of brainstem and basal forebrain but the cerebral networks accounting for external perceptual awareness and internal self-related mentation are disrupted. Specifically, the 'external awareness' network encompassing lateral fronto-temporo-parietal cortices bilaterally, and the 'internal awareness' network including midline anterior cingulate/mesiofrontal and posterior cingulate/precuneal cortices, are functionally disconnected. By contrast, patients in minimally conscious state 'minus', who show non-reflex behaviors, are characterized by right-lateralized recovery of the external awareness network. Similarly, patients who evolve to minimally conscious state 'plus' and respond to commands recover the dominant left-lateralized language network. Now, the use of active experimental paradigms targeting at detecting motor-independent signs of awareness or even establishing communication with these patients, challenge these two clinical boundaries. Such advances are naturally accompanied by legitimate neuroscientific and ethical queries demanding our attention on the medical implementations of this new knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available