4.5 Review

Value normalization in decision making: theory and evidence

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 970-981

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.07.011

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [SES-0851408, SES-0926544, SFS-0850840]
  2. NIH [R01 AA018736, R21 AG038866]
  3. Betty and Gordon Moore Foundation
  4. Lipper Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sizable body of evidence has shown that the brain computes several types of value-related signals to guide decision making, such as stimulus values, outcome values, and prediction errors. A critical question for understanding decision-making mechanisms is whether these value signals are computed using an absolute or a normalized code. Under an absolute code, the neural response used to represent the value of a given stimulus does not depend on what other values might have been encountered. By contrast, under a normalized code, the neural response associated with a given value depends on its relative position in the distribution of values. This review provides a simple framework for thinking about value normalization, and uses it to evaluate the existing experimental evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available