4.2 Review

Renalase: its role as a cytokine, and an update on its association with type 1 diabetes and ischemic stroke

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 513-518

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000044

Keywords

cell signaling; cytokine; mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway; protein kinase B; type 1 diabetes

Funding

  1. VA Connecticut
  2. National Basic Research Program of China 973 Program [2012CB517600, 2012CB517602]
  3. Shanghai Health Bureau [ZXSNXD-CC-ZDYJ002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Remarkable progress has been achieved over the past 2 years in understanding the cellular actions of renalase, its pathophysiology and potential therapeutic utility. Recent findings There has been a paradigm shift in our thinking about the mechanisms underlying the cellular actions of renalase. We now understand that, independent of its enzymatic properties, renalase functions as a signaling molecule, a cytokine that interacts with a yet-to-be identified plasma membrane receptor(s) to activate protein kinase B and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. These signaling properties are critical to its cytoprotective effects. New information regarding renalase's enzymatic function as an a-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidase/anomerase will be reviewed. Lastly, we will discuss the association of certain single nucleotide polymorphisms in the renalase gene with type 1 diabetes and with ischemic stroke, and the clinical implications of these findings. Summary The consistent association of renalase single nucleotide polymorphisms and the development of type 1 diabetes is a great interest particularly because we now understand that renalase functions as a cytokine. Future work on renalase should focus on exploring the identity of its receptor(s), and its potential role as an immune modulator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available