4.2 Review

Intersection of cardiovascular disease and kidney disease: atrial fibrillation

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 275-282

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000444820.80249.56

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; atrial fibrillation; end-stage renal disease

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [K23 DK088865]
  2. NIDDK [5 U01 DK060902, K24 DK92291]
  3. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [5 U19 HL091179, 5 RC2 HL101589]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia in patients with kidney disease. The purpose of this review is to describe the burden of atrial fibrillation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), postulate possible mechanisms to explain this burden of disease, understand the clinical consequences of atrial fibrillation and review the treatment options for atrial fibrillation specific to patients with kidney disease. Recent findings Recent literature has revealed that the clinical multiorgan impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with CKD and ESRD is substantial. Although novel oral anticoagulants to treat atrial fibrillation and prevent associated complications have been tested in large trials in the general population, there is a paucity of data on the efficacy and safety of these agents in patients with advanced CKD and ESRD. Atrial fibrillation is a significant comorbidity in patients with CKD and ESRD with important prognostic implications. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms that contribute to the disproportionate burden of this arrhythmia in patients with kidney disease and in to treatment options specific to this population of high-risk patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available