4.7 Article

The Role of the Posterior Cerebellum in Saccadic Adaptation: A Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 14, Pages 5471-5479

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4064-14.2015

Keywords

adaptation; cerebellum; saccades; TDCS

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council UK [MR/J004588/1]
  2. Parkinson's UK/0ddfelows Trust [G-1108]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT087554]
  4. Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  5. National Institute for Health Research Oxford Cognitive Health Clinical Research Facility
  6. MRC [MR/J004588/1, MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/J004588/1, MR/K00414X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The posterior vermis of the cerebellum is considered to be critically involved in saccadic adaptation. However, recent evidence suggests that the adaptive decrease (backward adaptation) and the adaptive increase (forward adaptation) of saccade amplitude rely on partially separate neural substrates. We investigated whether the posterior cerebellum could be differentially involved in backward and forward adaptation by using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). To do so, participants' saccades were adapted backward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS. In two extra groups, subjects underwent a nonadaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effects of TDCS on saccadic execution. Surprisingly, cathodal stimulation tended to increase the extent of both forward and backward adaptations, while anodal TDCS strongly impaired forward adaptation and, to a smaller extent, backward adaptation. Forward adaptation was accompanied by a greater increase in velocity with cathodal stimulation, and reduced duration of change for anodal stimulation. In contrast, the expected velocity decrease in backward adaptation was noticeably weaker with anodal stimulation. Stimulation applied during nonadaptation sessions did not affect saccadic gain, velocity, or duration, demonstrating that the reported effects are not due to direct effects of the stimulation on the generation of eye movements. Our results demonstrate that cerebellar excitability is critical for saccadic adaptation. Based on our results and the growing evidence from studies of vestibulo-ocular reflex and saccadic adaptation, we conclude that the plasticity at the level of the oculomotor vermis is more fundamentally important for forward adaptation than for backward adaptation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available