4.2 Review

Antihypertensive therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 50-55

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283402eb5

Keywords

angiotensin-converting enzyme; atrial natriuretic peptide; beta adrenergic; B-type natriuretic peptide; resistant hypertension

Funding

  1. NIH [M01RR00827, HL58120]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000827] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL058120] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often have hypertension that is difficult to control. We review the causes of OSA hypertension and evidence supporting specific therapies. Recent findings Sleep apnea commonly accompanies the metabolic syndrome and renal insuffiency. Apneas stimulate atrial natriuretic peptide release and sympathetic nerve activity, which persists throughout the daytime. The combination of increased sympathetic nerve activity and a nocturnal diuresis help explain reports that beta-1 antagonists lower blood pressure more than thiazide diuretics in OSA. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II blocking drugs have been equally effective in some studies. Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension usually have OSA and have had a good antihypertensive response to spironolactone. Summary Although most elderly hypertensives respond to diuretics and calcium channel blockers, patients with OSA responded to beta-1 adrenergic blockers, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin II blocking drugs. The response to a second drug is not known. However, many patients with OSA remain hypertensive on three antihypertensive agents, in which case the addition of spironolactone has been effective. It is reasonable to prescribe shorter acting antihypertensive drugs at night to treat nocturnal hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available