4.7 Article

Recollection-Related Increases in Functional Connectivity Predict Individual Differences in Memory Accuracy

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1763-1772

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3219-14.2015

Keywords

angular gyrus; episodic memory; fMRI; functional connectivity; hippocampus; recollection

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH [5R01MH072966]
  2. NIA [1R01AG039103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recollection involves retrieving specific contextual details about a prior event. Functional neuroimaging studies have identified several brain regions that are consistently more active during successful versus failed recollection-the core recollection network. In the present study, we investigated whether these regions demonstrate recollection-related increases not only in activity but also in functional connectivity in healthy human adults. We used fMRI to compare time-series correlations during successful versus unsuccessful recollection in three separate experiments, each using a different operational definition of recollection. Across experiments, a broadly distributed set of regions consistently exhibited recollection-related increases in connectivity with different members of the core recollection network. Regions that demonstrated this effect included both recollection-sensitive regions and areas where activity did not vary as a function of recollection success. In addition, in all three experiments the magnitude of connectivity increases correlated across individuals with recollection accuracy in areas diffusely distributed throughout the brain. These findings suggest that enhanced functional interactions between distributed brain regions are a signature of successful recollection. In addition, these findings demonstrate that examining dynamic modulations in functional connectivity during episodic retrieval will likely provide valuable insight into neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in memory performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available