4.3 Review

LDL cholesterol targets - how low to go?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 265-270

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283556c1b

Keywords

LDL cholesterol targets; lipid-lowering; statins; vascular risk

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_U137686853] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686853] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686853] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces vascular risk. Current guidelines recommend initiating statin therapy in patients with a yearly coronary heart disease risk of around 1.5-2%, and most clinicians prescribe standard statin regimens (e.g. 40 mg simvastatin daily). However, there is some uncertainty about whether patients at somewhat lower vascular risk should receive lipid-lowering therapy and also how intensive statin treatment should be. Recent findings Lowering LDL-C by around 1 mmol/l reduces vascular mortality and major morbidity by about one-fifth, and more recent randomized trials comparing intensive versus standard statin regimens confirm that a further LDL-C reduction of 0.5 mmol/l results in an additional 15% reduction in the risk of a major vascular event. Furthermore, statin therapy significantly reduces vascular mortality and morbidity in patients with less than 1% annual risk of a major vascular event. In general, statins are safe and well tolerated, but 80 mg simvastatin is associated with an unacceptably high risk of statin-induced myopathy. Summary Lipid-lowering therapy with statins is cost-effective for a wider range of patients than currently recommended. Intensive statin therapy is associated with larger reductions in vascular risk, and lower LDL-C targets (particularly for higher-risk individuals) should help reduce vascular mortality and major vascular morbidity substantially.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available